(no subject)
Oct. 4th, 2004 03:19 amWell, that was very interesting after all.
Frankly I had no clue who Aubrey or Maturin were and thought it was some kind of scifi series I was missing out on (honestly, I see no cinema, and can't bring myself to care very often). I imagined Dr. Maturin as some sort of psychopathic gene manipulator bent on world domination, like a character out of a Kubrick film.
At any rate, now I know, so please don't tell me or urge me to see the film because er, no. But I was intrigued by what Paul Bettany had to say about Maturin. He said that this was the sort of man you could put in solitary for five years and he'd go out pretty much the same way he came in -- he could create a whole world in his brain and be content with it. I often feel that way.
My problem is not requiring input; I can sit for hours and dream and make worlds in my head. My problem is output. If I were locked in solitary confinement for years on end with paper and pens enough to last me, I'd probably be all right. Unhappy, but sane. If I had no books and nothing with which to write, I imagine I'd end up sitting in my little cell telling stories to the walls. It's not that I require an audience so much as I have to put the thoughts somewhere -- I don't care if anyone ever reads them, so long as they're there.
Either way, let us hope I never end up in solitary for five years, because that would suck unqualified. :D
Frankly I had no clue who Aubrey or Maturin were and thought it was some kind of scifi series I was missing out on (honestly, I see no cinema, and can't bring myself to care very often). I imagined Dr. Maturin as some sort of psychopathic gene manipulator bent on world domination, like a character out of a Kubrick film.
At any rate, now I know, so please don't tell me or urge me to see the film because er, no. But I was intrigued by what Paul Bettany had to say about Maturin. He said that this was the sort of man you could put in solitary for five years and he'd go out pretty much the same way he came in -- he could create a whole world in his brain and be content with it. I often feel that way.
My problem is not requiring input; I can sit for hours and dream and make worlds in my head. My problem is output. If I were locked in solitary confinement for years on end with paper and pens enough to last me, I'd probably be all right. Unhappy, but sane. If I had no books and nothing with which to write, I imagine I'd end up sitting in my little cell telling stories to the walls. It's not that I require an audience so much as I have to put the thoughts somewhere -- I don't care if anyone ever reads them, so long as they're there.
Either way, let us hope I never end up in solitary for five years, because that would suck unqualified. :D