Aug. 1st, 2010

Ashleigh Brilliant once said, "My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right."

Sherlock is very much making me feel that way.

Last week, I thought it was the pilot for an abortive television series, so I looked at Sherlock from the angle of a potentially perpetual episodic show. I examined what the problems were with it and how they could have been solved if you wanted to extend it to a couple of seasons.

Fandom tells me that this is not so; only three episodes were commissioned, but they were commissioned with intent. So this week, I was prepared to apply a different critical viewpoint, treating the episode as part two of three, complete in themselves. This gives a lot more room for character exploration and doesn't require as much pure plot because you're not stretching the characters out over several episodes. I thought it would be, well, balanced in the same way the pilot was.

Boy, was I wrong.

Welcome to Sam's Six Things About Sherlock, Episode Two: The Blind Banker )

3a. Seriously, Watson's clothes, I can't even. I would love to have been in on the production meetings where the costume designer made the pitch. "Yes, well, with Watson we're going for actively offensive to the viewer."



Protip for anyone who wears men's dress shirts: don't fasten the top button if you're not wearing a tie. You look like an asshat.

Profile

Sam's Backup Page

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 30th, 2025 10:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios