(no subject)
Jun. 20th, 2011 02:19 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Nowhere in the article does it mention that the stolen object is, in fact, A REALLY OLD BONE.
I suppose he could have been trying to be as delicate as the officials. From Reuters:
The relic, which police and church officials have declined to describe, had been on display for the first time in nine years...
There are probably plenty of rational reasons not to describe something that's been stolen, but I can only think of two off the top of my head: either they think it'll prevent people from faking up replicas to sell or "return" for reward money, or they know it's kind of freaky to keep bits of saints lying around and don't want to remind people they do it (A of P's tongue, incidentally, is on display in Italy, because Italy hogs all the good stuff).
But I think really the church should realise that if they won't describe the Relic of St. Anthony -- at least designate which bone -- we're all just going to assume it's his penis. And no amount of remarks on the irony of a relic of the Patron Saint Of Lost Stuff being stolen is going to make up for it.
After all, penis theft has precedent.
If you'll pardon the pun (or even if you won't) the story does have a happy ending. The police found the relic undamaged, and it's been restored to the church, where hopefully they've attached a bell or something to prevent this from happening again. The suspect has apparently been released "due to a medical condition" which the police won't elaborate on either; the whole thing is veritably shrouded in mystery. (It's probably something simple like she's not quite mentally stable and didn't understand what she was doing, but admittedly that's less interesting than the mystery.)
Shadow hoped, and she wasn't really wrong, that I would be inspired to write some kind of story about all this. I have to say that I think there is a rich vein of material to be found in the story of a stolen holy penis.
OH MAN I LOVE WHEN I GET TO USE THE FRACTURED PENIS TAG.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 07:32 pm (UTC)It's also home to a hand-carved, life-sized Stations of the Cross, but that doesn't have anything to do with bits of dead people in ornate containers.
You can find the image here: http://multimedia.post-gazette.com/Revolution/default.asp. I recommend viewing it in full-screen mode. You can zoom in using the click wheel on your mouse.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 07:50 pm (UTC)Wouldn't surprise me, though.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 07:42 pm (UTC)You have to wonder about the apparent conflict between the concepts of veneration of relics and resurrection of the body.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 02:10 pm (UTC)I'm totally gonna write a book about a guy hired to authenticate a holy prepuce.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 02:46 pm (UTC)I'm envisioning a sort of cross between Sherlock Holmes and Robert Langdon. Preferably with Holmes's hair.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 02:57 pm (UTC)Should be fun. :D
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 03:12 pm (UTC)Speaking of "the uses of the penis in the visual arts," are you familiar with Leo Steinberg's fascinating work The Sexuality of Christ in Renaissance Art and in Modern Oblivion? Wikipedia doesn't have an article devoted to the book itself, alas, but if you use the title as a search term it will point you to articles discussing several of the issues Steinberg raises. I remember blushing my way through the Uffizi Gallery not long after reading it. I was like a hormonal boy with a busty teacher, unable to drag my eyes up to where they belonged. The Doni Tondo, OMG. http://bit.ly/lOeEyg
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 06:42 pm (UTC)WELL HELLO THERE DONI TONDO.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 08:14 pm (UTC)dammit! Plot bunny:
There is no way Cap'n Jack is NOT involved in the mysterious penis theft.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 05:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 07:40 am (UTC)Of course, this means that at some point in the future, everyone in the universe will be Jack Harkness. That'll go on until inevitably it'll be like the dragonspace in Guards! Guards! by Terry Pratchett (http://www.harpercollins.com/features/pratchettBooks/excerpt.aspx?isbn=9780061020643), only with much better teeth.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 12:15 pm (UTC)Nate
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 12:26 pm (UTC)Nate
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 12:27 pm (UTC)Nate
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 12:34 pm (UTC)It's also interesting when you compare it to certain current season Who plotlines, for many reasons that I won't elaborate on in case I spoil people.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 10:25 pm (UTC)LOLOLOL. That's one good-sized relic.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-20 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 03:56 am (UTC)Though maybe, if they like it, they should put a ring on it.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 07:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 09:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-21 12:51 pm (UTC)