I am packed for Texas! Mostly. I always have to loop my phone charging cord through a handle on my suitcase before I go to bed, so in the morning I won't forget to pack it.

Mum keeps texting me to ask how it's going. I forget that for some people, packing is an event, with angst and fear involved. I LOVE packing, because all the stuff you need is put tidily into one tiny space, and then you get to go somewhere, and that's always exciting! So it boggles the mind that she has asked me how packing is going four times today, because the very first time she asked, I was already fully packed.

[livejournal.com profile] heidi8 reminded me yesterday that Studio Sixty started airing five years ago this month. It was an epic, terrible distortion of a television show by the end, but on the way there were some damn fine moments. I downloaded the first few episodes and, watching the pilot, I still love Wes Mendel's opening speech. I also have a nostalgic urge to forcibly cut Matt Perry's hair.

The sheer potential of that pilot was so great, and what happened next was a terrible misuse of forty minutes each week. It was almost glorious in its awfulness, especially the last few episodes. I've heard through various sources that the awfulness was intentional once Aaron Sorkin found out it had been cancelled, so perhaps he was going for glorious. I hope I am never so embittered, but I can't deny he committed, and commitment, of course, is what comedy is all about.
I took a break from mainlining Life On Mars to watch the last episode of That Show Without a Name.

1. Even in the mess, there are still shining moments. Danny adopting Rebecca? Priceless. Jordan's eyes were HUGE and blue and it was just awesome.

2. That being said, I'm not sure I bought the OMG MARK IS ALIVE scene. It was a little too saccharine. I'm glad everyone lived, of course, but...I don't know. The cigars? The weeping Englishwoman? Matt asking everyone's permission to date Harrie? It was a happy ending because it was the series finale. I don't know. If they'd been on for like four seasons, I might have bought it, but twenty-two episodes isn't enough for that kind of scene. On the other hand, twenty-two episodes was WAY too much for that show.

3. I am so glad I will never have to encounter Harriet Hayes again. And if Matt had the good sense he was born with, he would be too.

3a. "We did a good show, but we can do better." Oh, Aaron Sorkin. Truer words were never spoken. God, it was such a glorious train wreck, and I am so glad it's over. Cast and crew, well done; writers, well, you did the best you could. You went out with a terrible whimper. But it was a good idea, and you made me laugh.

And the ghost light was a nice touch.
Sam's Three Things about The Show Which Has No Name:

Okay, wait.

Did that episode just happen? Because it seems like while forty minutes of episode happened, nothing actually happened. Except for one utterly gratuitous Author Self-Insert Rejects God scene.

I realise they're building to the finale, but this is ridiculous.

And yes. *sigh* I will be tuning in next week.
Two more episodes of Studio Sixty.

I'm not sure I can take two more episodes of a show that vacillates so wildly between genius and utter dogshit.

1. You know one of them's going to die. I mean that just has to happen. You don't get two happy endings, not for both Jordan and Tom's brother. Since there's no second season in which Danny can endure a neverending legal battle for custody of his daughter, and because Mark Jeter does not even have a face, I'm going to go with Tom's Brother Dies. Sorry, Tom.

2. Harrie, you are so worthless. I wanted to like you. I did. But you're worthless! So I can't. I'm replacing you with Awesome 29-year-old Sports Medicine Guy Named Jess. He's funnier than you.

3. You know, really, why Matt was annoyed that Danny didn't use his pre-scripted proposal? Because in his new draft he drew this amazing allegory where he was Danny and he was talking to Danny and at the end it said "Danny Tripp, will you marry me" and then poor closeted Danny went and proposed to the wrong person.

Sorry. I like Jordan, but nothing survives the great and powerful Matt/Danny ship.

3a. HEY WHAT DID I SAY ABOUT FLASHBACKS? THAT'S RIGHT, ALL HELL IS NOW INVOLVED!

POWERING UP ALL HELL BLASTERS

ALL HELL SEQUENCE INITIALISED

PASSWORD ENTERED: ALLHELL

PREPARE TO EXECUTE ALL HELL SEQUENCE

EXECUTING...


*plink*

Dammit, what went wrong now, if it's not one thing it's another, I was sure I checked the connections this ti...hey, who took the AAA batteries out of the All Hell Blasters? Seriously, you couldn't run down to the corner store and buy some of your own for your goddamn TV remote?
Sam's Three Things About Studio Sixty, Those Whores:

1. Seriously, Harrie? Seriously? You're choosing that moment to show everyone how pious you are? I mean -- I have no problem with prayer, or public prayer, or even public evangelism. I wouldn't stop it if I saw it, because that's freedom of speech and freedom of religion right there in a tidy bundle. But I do believe that getting down on your knees and praying aloud in front of your entire peer group at that precise moment is the height of self-aggrandising tackiness, and if I had any tiny shred of respect left for Harrie I would burn it. She is being demoted, something that has not happened since I took away Niki's name for being lame. Harrie, I take your name. You shall now only be known as That Chick.

1a. In addition, it's lame television. The drama would be ratcheted up several notches if That Chick simply said "okay" and sat down, and Matt asked her if she was okay or what she was doing, and she said "I'm praying."

2. "It doesn't have to be good. It just has to be on." Jack said that and the look on Matt's face is a look I'm pretty sure I learned to make myself, from my mentor, for whom medocrity is not the eighth deadly sin but rather the only one.

3. Cal continues to be awesomeness personified. Just thought I'd put that out there.

3a. One more flashback and I swear to all hell. To all hell. I don't know what I will do, but all hell will be involved.
Oh, Studio Sixty.

Studio Sixty is like the girlfriend you've had (well, okay, for the majority of you, boyfriend) who seems so incredible at first that you just want to be near them, without cherishing any hopes of them ever knowing your name. Then you somehow miraculously manage to catch their eye, and for a few blissful months you are deliriously* happy together. But slowly you start to realise that while they are still fantastic they are also completely mad and used to belong to a cult and they eat strange things and may have done prison time, they're a little vague about that, or may just have spent the year living in a teepee**.

So you do the smart thing and break up with them or at least wait until they go on permanent hiatus, but then one night you get a drunken booty call informing you that they're BACK from hiatus and/or living in a teepee, and let's go for drinks, and before you know it you're shipping Simon/Tom all over again even though you know you'll regret watching it in the morning, especially the bit where the host has to do her monologue with no cue cards.

Which I skipped. But I can't stop watching.

I WISH I KNEW HOW TO QUIT YOU, STUDIO SIXTY.

* I typo'd this as deliciously. Am I the only on who thinks it's suspicious that they're only one letter different from each other?
** I knew a guy who did this. I asked him why. He said, "Because I got tired of paying an electricity bill."
Sam's Three Things About Studio 60.

1. Still totally uninterested in Harriet's crisis of conscience about anything, including making a film where a seventeen-year-old blows his brains out on camera. Also, Matt's total dependence on Harrie is not only disturbing but manipulative and straying into the territory where men start to think it's okay to hit women.

2. Between his geek-out over the guillotine and his exploding-baby prank, Cal is solid-gold MADE OF WIN, and we'll just forget the snake incident entirely, shall we?

3. Sigh. I'd like to do a normal three things and ignore 3a until you got there, but it's hard. Because as much as I'm going to miss not seeing Jordan and Danny hooking up and Tom wooing Lucy and Steven Webber chewing the scenery, I agree with the decision. The show's writing is in the tubes, the arcs are nonexistent or truncated halfway through their natural course, and Matt and Harrie aren't interesting. It's just a shame that if it had to be cancelled, it couldn't have had a full and thorough quality run first.

3a. From Wikipedia: As of February 17, 2007, Studio 60 had been pulled from NBC's lineup to be replaced with The Black Donnellys starting February 26. No date has been set for its return.

Well, now I can start watching Heroes like my coworkers keep saying I should.
Okay. One more week. You get one more week, Sorkin. Again. On the strength of Tom Jeter, one more week.

I'm like an addict. (Ironic, huh?)

1. Danny and Jordan have chemistry to burn. To burn and then douse with oil and burn some more. Their chemistry is like some kind of nuclear explosion in Los Alamos. So why was this entire episode basically devoted to Matt, tripping out and brooding on Harrie? Did we really need to see that? Does anyone, anywhere, care about the dead, much-beaten horse that is Matt and Harrie anymore? Even Harrie doesn't care about Matt and Harrie anymore. Get over it, Matt. She's a honey-crusted nutbar.

2. Sometimes, when I write Three Things, I picture Aaron Sorkin reading my comments like his characters on his TV shows do, and it makes me feel a little guilty. Then I get over it, because nobody cares about Matt and Harrie and if I don't bring Aaron Sorkin the truth, who will? On that note, I would like to present you, Mr. Sorkin, with some alternatives to the Matt/Harrie tango of doom. They are, in order of which I like best: Matt and Tim the Gloomy Screenwriter, Matt and Suzanne the snarky assistant, Matt and Jack's Soon To Be Ex Wife (for the comedic value; you know you want to see a Matt-Jack chase scene), Matt and anyone in the cast except Harrie.

3. I DON'T LIKE LYSISTRATA EITHER. Simon clearly has good taste. Not that we didn't know this.

3a. Sorry the Three Things were sort of one-note tonight. I can't help it if the episode was too.
Sam's Three Things about Studio 60:

1. ONE MORE EPISODE, SORKIN. That's all you get. If next week doesn't suck too badly, I'll give you one after that on the strength of the Danny/Jordan kiss. Which was awesome, but does not make up for the awful setup. Almost, but not quite. Especially the part about the key-hiding rock. Seriously, nobody's going to ever mistake a key-hiding rock for a real rock if they pick it up.

2. Now I see why Tom is part of the big three. I couldn't figure it out, other than that he's quite funny. I suppose that's enough, but it seems like to be a part of the inner circle's inner circle, you have to have more. His speech to Lucy about lies and the pay scale shows that he has an understanding of the way power works in relationships and the ins and outs of his business. He's by far the most interesting, at least to me, of the big three.

3. I think I've figured out what makes me nuts about Matt and Harry's innumerable and tedious arguments. It's that they say things that apparently have significance to each other, but the audience is a bit at a loss. Harry will say "You're like a tree, Matt" and Matt will be like "There are chickens in the trees" and it would clearly have some meaning that makes her decide some momentous thing. Except it doesn't, and no decision actually ever gets made, and the setup to Matt's joke was so painful that I knew to hit skip, and knew just how far to skip to escape it.

3a. I hate to say this because I do, truly, like Natalie Cole. But man, she hasn't always looked like a drag queen "doing" Natalie Cole, has she? Her face is really...long and pointy.
Sam's three things about Studio 60.

1. Okay, really now. I could just about cope with Jordan's phone being "broken" so that she'd have to use speakerphone, but Danny's office being "painted" so that he has to take Jordan up on the roof, and then they get locked out? What? SERIOUSLY, I SAW THAT EPISODE OF FRIENDS. Who is Aaron Sorkin letting write this crap? And let me tell you, if you can't get cellphone reception on top of a STEEL GIRDER BUILDING in DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES, then it is because your cellphone is a nonfunctional prop you picked up by mistake.

2. That having been said, Jack's interview with Tom could not have been more awesome if there were racecars and internet memes involved.

3. And Cal continues to be my hero. I want to be him when I grow up. "Harmless vipers, right? Right?"

3a. To be honest, despite tonight's 2 and 3, no show has ever failed me so completely in such a short amount of time. Now I get what Lost fans were feeling in second season. I'm awfully close to crossing it off my viewing list, which would suck because there isn't that much on my viewing list right now to begin with. But I'm not going to stay loyal to a show I have to fast-forward through portions of, every week, because they're either blatantly obvious or painful to watch. So, Mr. Sorkin, I am throwing down the fandom gauntlet. You can finish up your little three-part-arc or whatever it is you think you're doing, and you can have one more episode after that to redeem yourself, but if this keeps up you don't deserve to be renewed for next season.
Sam's Three Things about Studio 60!

And before you ask, I'm not magic -- I downloaded the episode, which airs a day earlier in Canada. Our brethren to the north have more than just gay marriage and maple sugar to offer us, my friends!

1. I found Danny's remark about "at least I'm back on television" kind of ironic, since really, that's the most I can say about this episode. With a few stellar exceptions, it was terrible. It was badly-paced, drawn-out, and mainly composed of people being pointlessly nasty to each other. I understand that conflict is the root of all entertainment, but conflict is not the same thing as bitchiness. Even the non-bitchy moments -- I can't even rewatch the opening scene, it's so awful.

2. There were some stellar standouts though. That included Jack Rudolph, who is not only magnificent but magnificently the same -- still a cranky boss with his head occasionally lodged firmly up his ass. Tom's date request, which is suited to my tastes (I favour "I like you. Want to go out?") was also fantastic, as was Suzanne. Therefore I have Three Good Dialogues for you:

2a. "I don't feel like a laughingstock." "That's only because you're a moron."
2b. "Thursday night?" "Sure." "Then my work here is done."
2c. "Any choice of username?" "Make something up." "BossSexy." "Not BossSexy!" "Awh, too late."

3. HOW GREAT IS IT THAT MATT IS GIVING THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO PROMOTE POLYAMORY? I'm serious! About half my friends are poly and come to think of it, so are all my roleplay characters (which I hadn't realised, and is a wee bit odd.) Plus, it ties in nicely with my idea of Matt as someone with a burning passion for Harry but a burning urge to sleep with most of the pretty faces he encounters.

3a. Why are the bad guys in Studio 60 always bald?
1. [info]theoriginalspy was right. This episode was just one long festival of fun fluff and I loved it. I especially loved the New Orleans subplot and Kevin Eubanks, because Kevin Eubanks is the last redeeming thing about The Tonight Show.

2. Okay, I like the expression "a fraction of a man" as much as anyone, but should they really have two separate characters describe two of Jordan's exes that way? Also, the mistakenly heiling Santa was a toy released in Germany and then hastily recalled.

3. COULD DANNY BE ANY MORE AWESOME? I THINK NOT.

3a. Coconuts and Suzanne are both FTW.

3b. It's reached Mullet proportions. Somebody kill Matthew Perry's hairstylist.
It's Monday, must mean it's time for Sam's Three Things About Studio Sixty!

1. Wow with the flashbacks. Um. Yeah. Wow. So much with the flashbacks. I hear Seinfeld did a sitcom episode backwards and that wasn't the most effective thing ever either. Granted this episode worked, and it's a good way to make people really focus on the show, but it could have worked better -- there were points where there weren't enough signifiers to draw the line between "then" and "now". Overall, a fun conceit that has worked in the past, but this time it was too -- noticeable? Perhaps there was just too much of it, or too much interweaving.

2. OMG YAY SUZANNE. She's my favourite. Actually Matt is my favourite, but he's Suzanne's favourite too, so it all kind of works out in some sort of cyclical fashion.

3. Seriously, how did Jordan get to be president of a network? I am totally behind most of the things she's said, but I'm also behind Jack -- there is a way to crush reporters like tiny bugs without being confrontational. There are ways to do it where the reporters don't even know they've been crushed. There's a lot of political action that goes into the life of a network executive, and there's no evidence in the writing that Jordan understands any of it or has ever played the game. So I guess either she got the job on guts, or she had a seizure between leaving one job and starting the new one at NBS, and forgot it all. I understand that the show thrives on conflict and a perfectly smooth, perfectly poised president would be boring, but her gaffes have no spacing between them at all, and they're not...they're not the right gaffes for a network president to make. Even a hormonal one.

3a. So many women to ship Danny with. I just can't pick one!

This doesn't really qualify as 3b, since it's a bit too meta, but I'll dig into it anyway...apparently in The West Wing the writers used to bash the internet a lot. I actually caught the whole Josh Versus The Internet episode, and thought it was hilariously funny because it was so true. Anyway, Studio Sixty has said some negative things about internet fandom and commentary -- some apt, some inappropriate -- but by and large I tend to agree with them, and I think this episode made some excellent points both pro and con.

Er. All of that was a leadup to say: now I'm all selfconscious about the Three Things on the off-chance that someone from the show stumbles across them and decides I am Part Of The Problem.
Sam's Three Things About Studio Sixty:

1. Oh, how we do love Cal. He's all, I'm a badass! Look at me chew out the writers! And then he turns out to be a closet set designer. So much love. Plus, he was an integral part of the back-and-forth scenes about ten minutes in that were strongly reminiscent of Sports Night.

2. Where's that reporter chick? She's missing some awesome scoop. She's going to kick herself for missing the trip to Pahrump.

3. I think the twist with all the writers leaving is really interesting and a good tangent to take. It's a mid-season series so they'll either tank or triumph right around spring sweeps. I actually like one of them, the one with the hair, so I was hoping he'd tell the bald one to go to hell, but then that wouldn't really have been very realistic. Much like a turkey that spouts too much blood. :D

3a. Wow. Costume is doing a really, really crap job of hiding Amanda Peet's baby-belly. Really, really bad. The director isn't really helping, though....

Okay guys, I'm outta here in about two hours, so no Three Things about House tonight. I'll have it downloaded by tomorrow and will still be doing the recap, but internet access will be sporadic (I will be out and about enjoying my friends and the Real World) until the 27th.

Be good while I'm gone and make sure the dog gets walked twice a day. :)
Sam's Three Things about Studio 60!

1. Given the teaser last week, I had a different expectation of this week's show; I expected more high interpersonal drama, rather like a grownup episode of the standard teen-drama Prom Episode where everyone's cheating on everyone else...which on paper was kinda the case, but The Wrap Party was a lot more subtle than I was expecting it to be. I also thought possibly more would happen at the wrap party rather than around it, but it's a nice touch. The episode didn't fail my expectations, it just didn't fit them.

2. This was the episode of Extras Stealing The Show. I saw it coming that the elderly man who was almost thrown out would be someone of Historical Significance. But I didn't really care, because he owned that role. He told the story about Clifford Odets so wonderfully and his voice was so full of hurt and bewilderment when he said "The next day he named names!" It was brilliant to watch.

3. I also saw it coming, at least as soon as Willy got out to do his atrocious set, that they'd uncover some other future writer in the bar. Again, though, didn't matter. The second stand-up really was terrible, he could have pulled those jokes off with more energy, and he played his acceptance of his new position with a very promising ambiguity. Nicely done.

3a. I've never been a huge fan of Amanda Peet, but I like her in this role and I think Jordan's social awkwardness outside of business hours is awfully charming.
Sam's Three Things about Studio 60, comin atcha.

1. WHO LET MATTHEW PERRY'S STYLIST DO BRADLEY WHITFORD'S HAIR?

2. I'll admit that I'm a fan of Sting. I own most of his albums and really don't care that he's pop or that his French in La Belle Dame Sans Regret is apparently really bad. And while I was totally going to comment about how cool it was to have him on the show, Suzanne the Wee Neurotic PA stole my heart and Sam's Second Thing. In part because I could see myself -- have seen myself, as a matter of fact -- doing something that stupid, but mostly just because I'm a sucker for hero-worship. And I like that Tom took the fall for her. 'Cause Tom can get away with things that a wee neurotic PA can't.

3. I love Cal, but where on earth does he get his intel? He's boss of the control room and head of tech, but that's not exactly the first person you run to with the hot Entertainment-Weekly-worthy news that Jordan McDeere didn't bid on a new reality show. Oooh...maybe he has the place bugged.

3a. One of the small details I like about the show is the attention to the sets and the way it helps create the fictional universe of NBS. I love fictional worldbuilding -- anyone who has encountered Ellis and his novels can attest to that. If you watch episode...three, I believe, The Focus Group, you'll see a number of posters for NBS shows in the background of the focus group's room, and a series of former NBS logos in one of the lobbies later on. In one, Jordan is walking down the hallway after the pitch session -- there's a poster behind her of a doctor who looks suspiciously like Dr. McDreamy from Grey's Anatomy, and it's titled "ATTENDING".

I cracked up.
Hokay, Sam's Three Things about Studio 60. HOORAY.

1. When I read the little blurb on NBC's website about "a frantic scramble to cover a mistake before half the country sees it" I assumed it had to be something like an on-aire gaffe or someone flashing a boobie. I didn't really see how they were going to make that work, so I think a PLAGIARISM PLOT is pure brilliance. And Matt's punching-the-filing-cabinet moment when he heard about the plagiarism actually made me say to Arsenic, "Matthew Perry is just absurdly talented." Because very few actors can go from baseball-bat-through-a-window to deep-shame-and-fury-over-plagiarism and make me believe it.

2. Okay, maybe I'm wrong about Harry being an interesting character.

3. I really am coming down to the idea that Danny is canonically gay and in love with Matt, and this week it's based solely on the LOOK he gave the hot journalist when she was introduced. That look that said "Your breasts have no power over me!" I like the journalist though, I see good things for her.

3a. I was talking about this tonight, when I mentioned YET AGAIN how much I like that the show gives airtime to the techs, particularly Wee Neurotic Tech and Cal. I was thinking that I'd like to see Wee Neurotic Tech get a nice big plotline at some point, and I realised that Studio 60 is great because I spontaneously come up with plots that I can realistically see happening on the show. And as much as I love House and have loved other shows in the past, the last show where I felt this way was The X-Files, which is the show that got me into fandom in the first place. So -- yeah. It's a good feeling.
It's time for Sam's Three Things about Studio 60! I was so tempted to make it Sam's Six Things, since there will be no House this week and thus no Three Things About House, but I decided to keep it simple. :D 1. Wow, could this show be just a little slashier? 2. The answer is no, by the way, not without actual gay sex. Though I am tempted to suggest that they may be taking Danny (that's uh, Josh from West Wing) down a plot arc about being in love with Matt -- we haven't heard anything about Danny's love life or what kind of person he finds attractive, which in a character-driven drama is a little odd. I'd also like to point out that actually 2 was supposed to be about Matthew Perry's continuing hair issues. Jesus, somebody wrest the styling gel from his hairdresser's grasp? 3. I'm kind of hoping that the actual sketches will be kept to a minimum in the series, because frankly, I find 99% of sketch comedy utterly uninteresting. Pick a joke, beat it to death, and make sure it's dead by giving it one last kick next week. I'm sure Matt and Danny are brilliant at what they do and try to beat the jokes as little as possible, but I'm glad all we had was a montage. 3a. Having said 3, I must point out that last week I saw "Commedia Dell'Arte" on the plannerboard and was intrigued, so I'm glad it got some air time this week. 3b. Cut for length when reposting. Jesus, I was longwinded in 2006. )
Sam's Three Things about Studio 60:

1. Dear NBC afiliate: Thank you for fixing whatever problem there was with the sound last week. I appreciate it.

2. Dear Matthew Perry: HEY WAY TO GO. The hair is workable.

3. Dear writers: Yes, more plz about a) the writers who dress like homeless people (I was doing my WTF face during that whole scene up until Matthew Perry went off on them) and b) the black guy who is tired of doing black guy schtick.

3a. Always, always ask for the butter.

As regards the earlier poll -- interestingly enough, the two most popular names so far are the first two I came up with. Tomorrow I'll explain why I asked.
Studio 60, first impressions, because everyone's doing it and I'm a sheep...

1. What the hell is up with their sound quality? I had to turn on captioning not because they were talking too fast (I followed Sports Night just fine, thanks) but because they were mumbling incessantly when they weren't totally drowned out by "ambient" background noise. Elocution lessons, my children, and maybe a bit tighter focus with the boom mic.

2. Yes. It's very funny. The problem is, I said what they were going to do about ten seconds before they did it. The Network references? YEAH, NO SHIT. She walked out the door and stopped? Yeah, of course she doesn't know where her office was. The remarks about Bossman not wanting to sleep with Amanda Peet? Well, duh. I could go on, but I don't want to seem predictable.

3. Ultimately, I don't care about 1 or 2. I don't even care if it's shaping up to be a thematic clone of The West Wing with entertainment standing in for politics (because I like entertainment more anyway). Not only are the people interesting but the dynamics are great. I laughed, and they deftly swerved around every cringeworthy moment that another show would totally have taken advantage of. I'll be watching again, and I hope it does well. I think it will.

3a. I doubt I will ever write fic for it, because there are oh-jesus many people in the cast and I still can't name the five major players in CSI without flashcards, but I'm sure there will be a lot of great fic. By someone. :D

3b. Matthew Perry, you are a good-looking guy who can do both drama and comedy. I also applaud your triumph over drug addiction. Now please, fix your goddamned hair.

Profile

Sam's Backup Page

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2 345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 28th, 2025 02:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios